"'Not all men,' sure, as the joke goes. But the people who live with that risk learn to presume the worst. Living your life in preparation for the moment when a man possibly snaps and tries to kill you can bring on serious resentment. Resentment not just of men, though there is that, but of the way that even mentioning that risk makes you subject to claims that you are “oversimplifying” how men behave. That you somehow have a lesser read on human nature and violence than the more reasonable sort who, not having had to deal with the behavior, claim you must have imagined it. Even when you literally have the YouTube video proving you aren't making it up."
— Why Is It So Hard For People To Understand That Elliot Rodger Hated Women? — by Michelle Dean
"It is also important to recognize that Brand’s individual levels of racism and sexism are not separate from the overarching systems of racism and sexism we reside in. To continue to engage in inherently racist and sexist acts on a micro level also showcases a lack of understanding around how it operates on a macro level, disproportionately hurting women and people of color."
— The Revolution Will Not Be (Russell) Brand-ed by Isabelle Natasia and Suey Park
"But the point of rethinking new political and social spaces together — as was felt profoundly by many of us engaged in Occupy’s headiest, fiercest days — was that we don’t need to align with, elevate, celebrate (nor indeed wholly reject or detest) any one person. Yes, we will continue to struggle against vanguardism and sexism and so many co-constitutive problems within ourselves and each other. We will fail and fail better and fail. We will struggle to know and reconstitute what “we” even really means. And I take Russell Brand at his word that he wants to fight too. This is no referendum on the comedian or his intentions. But this is no time to forgo feminism in the celebration of that which we truly don’t need — another god, or another master."
— I don’t stand with Russell Brand, and neither should you by Natasha Lennard
"They evoke the phrase “post-feminist era,” which they can’t really define, but nonetheless characterize as some hazily demarcated epoch wherein women began openly extolling variations of sexual preference and practice that hew a bit too closely to the power-differential/fetish-porn model men have been shamefacedly, thrillingly jacking off to for centuries."
— What Men Talk About When They Talk About Mary Gaitskill
24. Do you think Gloria Steinem waxes?
25. I don’t know! I could go either way. She’s so stylish and inspirational. Those incredible glasses and shift dresses.
26. Can we agree that the actual litmus test of feminism is whether or not you would ask Gloria Steinem if she has pubes?
— The Comment Section for Every Article Ever Written About Intimate Grooming
"Juggling the personal with the political isn’t easy in a biased society. We are, even the most diligent of us, influenced by gender, race, and other identities. And we make personal and professional decisions based on a variety of needs and pressures. Judging each other without acknowledging these influences is uncharitable at best and dishonest at worst. A tiny top and a traditional marriage should not be enough to strip a woman otherwise committed to gender equality of the feminist mantle. If we all had pundits assessing our actions against a feminist litmus test, I reckon not even Gloria Steinem and bell hooks would pass muster. Women must be allowed their humanity and complexity. Even self-proclaimed feminists. Even Queen Beys."
— All Hail the Queen? by Tamara Winfrey Harris